The recent finalization of the Medicaid Access Rule by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) marks a pivotal moment for Medicaid providers and the communities they serve. One of the most significant elements of this rule is the 80/20 requirement, which mandates that 80 percent of Medicaid reimbursement funds to providers must be dedicated to caregiver wages. This new stipulation aims to enhance the quality of care by ensuring that caregivers are fairly compensated.

While this change does not directly impact private home care companies like Minute Women, it raises important considerations for the entire industry. Associations such as the Home Care Association of America (HCAOA) have voiced concerns, suggesting that the new rule might not fully address the core issues at hand and could lead to unintended consequences in care provision.

What does this mean for the future of Medicaid and those who rely on its services? Dive into our detailed analysis to understand the nuances of the CMS 80/20 Rule, its potential effects on at-home care in MA, and how it might affect you or your loved ones. Read on to discover expert insights and the latest discussions surrounding in-home care for elderly parents.

What We’ll Cover:


The Opposition to the CMS 80/20 Rule

In reflecting on the various perspectives surrounding this new rule, it is important to acknowledge the nuanced concerns brought forward by the HCAOA. Their outlined reasons for opposing the 80/20 provision shed light on potential challenges within the industry:

Firstly, the HCAOA highlights that the 80/20 provision may not effectively address the core issue of inadequate reimbursement rates. They argue that these rates are already insufficient, leaving little room for private home care providers to make necessary adjustments. Rather than focusing on how existing Medicaid funding is utilized, they advocate for encouraging states to raise reimbursement rates and offering an enhanced Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP) as a more impactful approach to improving wages for direct care workers (DCWs).

Secondly, the 80/20 provision may conflict with efforts to enhance quality measures within the industry. The rigidity of this requirement in terms of cost allocation could potentially stifle innovation and support for the caregiving workforce, which is crucial for ongoing improvements in home care for the elderly.


The CMS 80/20 Rule Across U.S. States

Considering the broader economic landscape, the escalating cost of living post-COVID, particularly in the Greater Boston area, adds another layer to this discussion. The rising costs of essentials such as gas, food, and shelter place significant pressure on our invaluable in-home caregivers. While there is merit in acknowledging the need for higher wages for caregivers, the interplay of cause and effect in business operations cannot be overlooked. Labor costs represent a substantial expense for service providers, and as these costs rise, so too do the prices of services.

A relevant example is the recent legislation in California, where a minimum wage of twenty dollars per hour for fast-food restaurant employees was enacted on April 1st. The subsequent increase in fast-food prices by 8% within less than a month demonstrates the tangible impacts of such policies.

The evolving landscape of wealth inequality and the hollowing out of the middle class over the past few decades present a larger societal challenge. Families, including my own, are grappling with soaring rental costs, and the aspiration of owning a home seems increasingly out of reach. The urgency of addressing this crisis is palpable.

Dementia treatment services can restore dignity, function, and happiness.

Read Our Pledge


The Impact of the CMS 80/20 Rule on Patient Care

A major concern raised by the HCAOA is the potential impact on patient access to care. They anticipate that many providers might be compelled to reduce services or exit the Medicaid sector entirely due to the 80/20 rule. This rule could disproportionately affect rural and underserved communities, contradicting the rule’s intended aim of enhancing access to care. Furthermore, the HCAOA points out the existing shortage of in-home caregivers and warns that the 80/20 provision could exacerbate this issue.

Compliance with the rule may force providers to cut essential support systems such as training, career advancement opportunities, supervision, and recognition programs. This transformation could hinder efforts to recruit and retain a robust caregiving workforce, ultimately impacting the quality of care.

Additionally, the variation in state rate methodologies poses a concern, as the 80/20 provision might undermine these diverse approaches. Many state agencies have formally opposed the rule on these grounds in home care for the elderly.


How the CMS 80/20 Rule Affects Private Home Care Agencies

While recognizing CMS’s intention to “level the playing field,” there are reservations about the efficacy of this particular policy. Concerns linger about whether the reimbursement rates are sufficient to attract and retain direct care workers, especially considering the growing demand from an aging population. The fear is that if employees can find more lucrative opportunities elsewhere, the industry will face an even more acute worker shortage.

The notion that companies can sustainably operate on a 20% gross profit margin may appear optimistic, particularly given the regulatory landscape. Home care agencies are often required to have staff members such as Registered Nurses (RNs) overseeing operations, which can be a significant expense. This change has raised concerns among many, as they fear that providers may face the difficult decision of either conforming to the rule or exiting the sector entirely rather than discovering a viable middle ground.

In alignment with the HCAOA’s perspective, the potential impact on rural areas is a real concern. These communities may feel the effects of the 80/20 rule sooner and more profoundly.


Find around-the-clock support for your elderly loved one today.

Find 24/7 Care


The Unintended Consequences of the CMS 80/20 Rule

We have yet to see the ripple effects of these changes within the private home care industry. Medicaid beneficiaries are unlikely to transition to private home care services immediately if their Medicaid agency faces challenges. However, questions loom about how this will impact the recruitment of DCWs in the private sector. Could the wages paid by CMS influence pay rates in the private sector, leading to increased costs for clients? Might it prompt agencies to close, pushing more in-home caregivers toward private home care? Might those agencies close their CMS-reimbursed service and transition to private pay services?

In the midst of these uncertainties, time will reveal the true implications of these regulatory shifts. We hope to make adjustments before irreversible damage occurs. However, the looming “silver tsunami” of an aging population underscores the urgent need for proactive solutions. The consequences of inaction on this front could be far-reaching, affecting not just the healthcare industry but society at large.


Key Takeaways

While the intent behind the Medicaid Access Rule is commendable, the concerns raised by industry experts warrant thoughtful consideration. Balancing the need for fair wages for caregivers with the sustainability of providers is a delicate dance. As we navigate these changes, it is crucial to keep a compassionate lens on the in-home caregivers who play an indispensable role in our communities’ well-being.


If you have questions about taking care of a senior, contact us today!

Learn More

About Us

Minute Women Home Care is a non-medical, in-home dementia care service provider. We assist our clients with activities of daily living so they can live at home with dignity and respect. We also support families in their mission to age in place rather than transition to a nursing facility.

Connect With Us



Subscribe to The Caregiver’s Toolbox Podcast


Google Podcasts